|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Doing Feminist Conversation Analysis
Celia Kitzinger
Department of Social Sciences at Loughborough University. C.C.Kitzinger{at}lboro.ac.uk
This article argues for, and offers empirical demonstration of, the value of conversation analysis (CA) for feminist research. It counters three key criticisms of CA as anti-feminist: the alleged incompatibility of CAs social theory with feminism; the purported difficulty of reconciling analysts and participants concerns; and CAs apparent obsession with the minutiae of talk rather than socio-political reality. It demonstrates the potential of CA for advances in lesbian/feminist research through two examples: developing a feminist approach to date rape and sexual refusal; and an ongoing CA study of talk in which people come out as lesbian, gay, bisexual or as having (had) same-sex sexual experiences. These examples are used to illustrate that it is precisely the features of CA criticized as anti-feminist which can be used productively in doing feminist conversation analysis.
Key Words: coming out conversation analysis date rape ethnomethodology feminism refusal talk-in-interaction turn-taking
Feminism & Psychology, Vol. 10, No. 2,
163-193 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0959353500010002001

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Kitzinger
Doing Gender: A Conversation Analytic Perspective
Gender Society,
February 1, 2009;
23(1):
94 - 98.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Kitzinger
Book review: EMANUEL A. SCHEGLOFF, Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Xvi + 300 pp
Discourse Society,
July 1, 2008;
19(4):
560 - 567.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Toerien and C. Kitzinger
Emotional Labour in Action: Navigating Multiple Involvements in the Beauty Salon
Sociology,
August 1, 2007;
41(4):
645 - 662.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Kitzinger
Feminist Conversation Analysis: Research by Students at the University of York, UK
Feminism Psychology,
May 1, 2007;
17(2):
133 - 148.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Guimaraes
I. Feminist Research Practice: Using Conversation Analysis to Explore the Researcher's Interaction with Participants
Feminism Psychology,
May 1, 2007;
17(2):
149 - 161.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Kitzinger and R. Rickford
VI. Becoming a `Bloke': The Construction of Gender in Interaction
Feminism Psychology,
May 1, 2007;
17(2):
214 - 223.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Stockill and C. Kitzinger
VII. Gendered `People': How Linguistically Non-gendered Terms Can Have Gendered Interactional Relevance
Feminism Psychology,
May 1, 2007;
17(2):
224 - 236.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Kitzinger and E. Peel
The de-gaying and re-gaying of AIDS: contested homophobias in lesbian and gay awareness training
Discourse Society,
March 1, 2005;
16(2):
173 - 197.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Kitzinger
Afterword: Reflections on Three Decades of Lesbian and Gay Psychology
Feminism Psychology,
November 1, 2004;
14(4):
527 - 534.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Makri-Tsilipakou
Greek Diminutive Use Problematized: Gender, Culture and Common Sense
Discourse Society,
November 1, 2003;
14(6):
699 - 726.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. TAINIO
`When Shall We Go for a Ride?' a Case of the Sexual Harassment of a Young Girl
Discourse Society,
March 1, 2003;
14(2):
173 - 190.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. H. Stokoe and A. Weatheral
Gender, language, conversation analysis and feminism
Discourse Society,
November 1, 2002;
13(6):
707 - 713.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Tanaka and M. Fukushima
Gender orientations to outward appearance in Japanese conversation: a study in grammar and interaction
Discourse Society,
November 1, 2002;
13(6):
749 - 765.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Speer
What can conversation analysis contribute to feminist methodology? Putting reflexivity into practice
Discourse Society,
November 1, 2002;
13(6):
783 - 803.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Weatherall
IV. The Politics of Language and Communication: Revisiting the Roots of Feminist Psychology
Feminism Psychology,
August 1, 2002;
12(3):
330 - 334.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Speer
Book Reviews
Discourse Society,
May 1, 2001;
12(3):
393 - 397.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. H. STOKOE and J. SMITHSON
Making Gender Relevant: Conversation Analysis and Gender Categories in Interaction
Discourse Society,
March 1, 2001;
12(2):
217 - 244.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Speer
Reconsidering the Concept of Hegemonic Masculinity: Discursive Psychology, Conversation Analysis and Participants' Orientations
Feminism Psychology,
February 1, 2001;
11(1):
107 - 135.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Edley
Conversation Analysis, Discursive Psychology and the Study of Ideology: A Response to Susan Speer
Feminism Psychology,
February 1, 2001;
11(1):
136 - 140.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. H. Stokoe
IV. Toward a Conversation Analytic Approach to Gender and Discourse
Feminism Psychology,
November 1, 2000;
10(4):
552 - 563.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Wilkinson
Feminist Research Traditions in Health Psychology: Breast Cancer Research
J Health Psychol,
May 1, 2000;
5(3):
359 - 372.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|