This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cermele, J. A. Articles by Anderson, K. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Defining Normal: Constructions of Race and Gender in the DSM-IV Casebook

Drew University, jcermele{at}drew.edu

Sharon Daniels

sd586{at}columbia.edu

Kristin L. Anderson

Drew University, kanders{at}drew.edu

This article explores the ways in which the DSM-IV Casebook constructs gender and race/ethnicity in depictions of individuals with mental illness. Analyses indicated that the case studies were gendered in accordance with socially sanctioned descriptions of women and men, with women more likely to be described negatively and in terms of physical attractiveness, and that women of color in particular were more likely to be sexualized. We argue that the studies in the Casebook contribute to a gendered and raced conceptualization of mental illness, and that these explicit definitions of pathology reflect implicit definitions of normalcy.

Key Words: clinical psychology • constructivism • feminism • mental health • sexism

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J. Hird A Typical Gender Identity Conference? Some Disturbing Reports from the Therapeutic Front Lines Feminism Psychology, May 1, 2003; 13(2): 181 - 199. [Abstract] [PDF]