Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Feminism & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brownlie, E. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Young Adults’ Constructions of Gender Conformity and Nonconformity: A Q Methodological Study

E. B. Brownlie

Child, Youth, and Family Programme, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 250 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1R8, Canada, ebrownli{at}sfu.ca

This study used Q methodology to investigate constructions of gender conformity and nonconformity in a sample of young adults. Fifty undergraduates sorted a series of statements along a continuum from ‘most agree’ to ‘most disagree’. Topics included gendered behaviour in children and adults, sexuality, intersex, transgender, and gender theories. Participants’ responses reflected four distinct perspectives. Interpretation of the perspectives was based on participants’ placements of the statements, and on interviews with selected participants. The perspectives contained different assumptions about gender and responses to gendered behaviour, particularly gender nonconformity. Yet participants representing each perspective endorsed statements that supported resistance to gender norms. Unidimensional gender scales focused on narrow ranges of gender-related behaviour may mask substantial differences in participants’ perspectives about gender.

Key Words: gender conformity and nonconformity • gender constructions • sexual orientation • transgender • intersex • Q methodology

Feminism & Psychology, Vol. 16, No. 3, 289-306 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0959353506067848
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?