Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Feminism & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, I-C.
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Lesbians and Bisexual Women in the Eyes of Scientific Psychology

I-Ching Lee

National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan, K27li{at}yahoo.com.tw

Mary Crawford

University of Connecticut, Mary.Crawford{at}UConn.edu

Social science research has contributed to the destigmatization of homosexuality which, in turn, has affected the topics researchers choose to study. We examined psychological research that focused on lesbians and bisexual women from 1975 to 2001 to determine if the frequency and content of this research reflect the increasingly positive view of sexual minorities in society. The results indicate that non-heterosexual people were included in less than 1 percent of published research, and lesbians and bisexual women were significantly less likely to be studied than gay and bisexual men. Content analysis of 533 abstracts followed by cluster analysis of 520 abstracts revealed four conceptual frameworks that characterized this body of research: Gender Identity, Attitudes towards Lesbians, Lesbians as Problems, and Life in Heterosexist Society. Together, changes over time in the quantity and emphasis of research shed light on how lesbianism and bisexuality have been constructed in psychological studies and highlight the politics of lesbian-bisexual visibility.

Key Words: attitudes toward sexualities • cluster analysis • gender bias in research • research critique • social construction

Feminism & Psychology, Vol. 17, No. 1, 109-127 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0959353507073096


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
J. Fish
Our Health, Our Say: Towards a Feminist Perspective of Lesbian Health Psychology
Feminism Psychology, November 1, 2009; 19(4): 437 - 453.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
Z. Darwin and C. Campbell
Understandings of Cervical Screening in Sexual Minority Women: A Q-Methodological Study
Feminism Psychology, November 1, 2009; 19(4): 534 - 554.
[Abstract] [PDF]