| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
VII. Gendered `People'How Linguistically Non-gendered Terms Can Have Gendered Interactional RelevanceSchool of Applied Social Sciences and Business Studies, St Martin's College,UK, CTStockill{at}ucsm.ac.uk
Department of Sociology, University of York, Heslington, UK, cckl @york.ac.uk Drawing on a case study of a single data extract, this article uses conversation analysis (CA) to explore the use of: (1) gendered linguistic terms (`girls' and `boys') that are treated as relevantly interactionally gendered by the participants; (2) use of a linguistically non-gendered term (`people') that is not treated as relevantly interactionally gendered; (3) use of a linguistically gendered term (`man') that is not treated as relevantly interactionally gendered; and (4) use of a linguistically non-gendered term (`people') that is treated as relevantly interactionally gendered by the participants. Our analysis shows that the interactional meaning of gender is not intrinsic to gendered linguistic forms, but to the action a linguistic form is used to do on any given occasion of use. This contributes to the development of feminist CA and to the understanding of how gender is constructed in talk-in-interaction, as well as more generally to conversation analytic work on membership categorization and person reference.
Key Words: conversation analysis feminism gender membership categorization person reference talk-in-interaction
Feminism & Psychology, Vol. 17, No. 2,
224-236 (2007) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||
