This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Darwin, Z. Articles by Campbell, C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Understandings of Cervical Screening in Sexual Minority Women: A Q-Methodological Study

Maternal and Fetal Health Research Group, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Hathersage Road, Manchester, M13 0JH, UK, zoe.darwin{at}postgrad.manchester.ac.uk

Carol Campbell

Department of Natural Science and Public Health, College of Arts and Sciences, Zayed University, Dubai Campus, PO Box 19282, United Arab Emirates, carol.campbell{at}zu.ac.ae

Discursive perspectives argue that cervical screening carries social and moral meaning. Overlooked by research into the health needs of sexual minority women, previous literature that has examined uptake of cervical screening has instead targeted increasing attendance via information and service provision. In order to explore the diversity of meanings that British sexual minority women have about cervical screening, the Q-sorts of 34 sexual minority women were factor analysed by-person and rotated to simple structure using Varimax. The five factors are interpreted and discussed relative to competing discourses on information provision within cervical screening. The five accounts are labelled ‘cervical screening is’: an essential health check that women have the right to refuse; a woman’s health entitlement; a vital test but degrading experience; a sensible thing to do; and an unnecessary imposition for some women. Critical approaches to informed choice are explored with attention to recent developments in cervical cancer prevention. Findings highlighting the need for affirmation of diversity within healthcare are considered in relation to existing criteria for UK national screening programmes.

Key Words: cervical screening • informed choice • Q-methodology • sexuality • social constructionism

Feminism & Psychology, Vol. 19, No. 4, 534-554 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0959353509342919


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?