Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Feminism & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burman, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Feminism and Discourse in Developmental Psychology: Power, Subjectivity and Interpretation

Erica Burman

Manchester Polytechnic, Hathersage Rd, Manchester M13 OJA, UK

The meeting of feminism with post-structuralism has brought issues of multiplicity of meanings to the fore. However, attention to difference threatens to disperse politics. This paper explores how these issues are played out in developmental psychological research. The concerns of feminist research with issues of reciprocity, consultation and accountability challenge developmental research conducted within the structural power relations of adult-child, experimenter-subject encounters. Equally, the feminist project of social transformation both draws upon and renders problematic developmental psychology. Drawing on examples from my interviews with children, I argue that attending to the power relations that are conferred by structural research practices and subject positions set up within discourse not only highlights previously unacknowledged diversity of meaning, but also closes off total interpretive relativism. What we need is a feminist realism that does not resort to positivism, that ties discourse to politics, and that makes politics more than discursive.

Feminism & Psychology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 45-59 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0959353592021004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
K. Stapleton
I. In Search of the Self: Feminism, Postmodernism and Identity
Feminism Psychology, November 1, 2000; 10(4): 463 - 469.
[PDF]


Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
J. Norton
Deconstructing the Fear of Feminity
Feminism Psychology, August 1, 1997; 7(3): 441 - 447.



Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
K. L. Henwood
Adult Mother-Daughter Relationships: Subjectivity, Power and Critical Psychology
Theory Psychology, November 1, 1995; 5(4): 483 - 510.
[Abstract]


Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
K. Henwood
Reviews
Feminism Psychology, May 1, 1995; 5(2): 252 - 259.



Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
K. Henwood and N. Pidgeon
Remaking the Link: Qualitative Research and Feminist Standpoint Theory
Feminism Psychology, February 1, 1995; 5(1): 7 - 30.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Sport and Social IssuesHome page
M. E. Duquin
THE BODY SNATCHERS AND DR. FRANKENSTEIN REVISITED: SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION AND DECONSTRUCTION OF BODIES AND SPORT
Journal of Sport and Social Issues, August 1, 1994; 18(3): 268 - 281.