Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Feminism & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, J.
Right arrow Articles by Waldby, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Women's Sex Talk and Men's Sex Talk: Different Worlds

June Crawford

School of Behavioural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia

Susan Kippax

School of Behavioural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia

Catherine Waldby

School of Behavioural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia

Communication in heterosexual encounters is often problematic, particularly front the perspective of the woman involved. In examining what renders such communication problematic, this article argues that both hegemonic discourses and particular interpersonal contexts need to be taken into account. Communication and negotiation take place in the intersubjective realm, the space where human beings make sense of their experience. An analysis of memories and accounts provided by groups of men and of women shows how the shared meanings which emerge within such encounters (occasioned meanings) are produced with reference to the dominant discourses. Since these discourses are designed to articulate men's interests, the question of gendered intersubjectivity is particularly salient. Intersubjectivity and negotiation are seen to be related in complex ways. Examples are given of occasions when intersubjectivity is either lacking or incomplete, and it is shown that the male sex drive discourse is one which is then often drawn upon in determining what takes place. This is particularly so for the sexually inexperienced, and thus from a feminist perspective a new discourse of heterosexuality becomes essential.

Feminism & Psychology, Vol. 4, No. 4, 571-587 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0959353594044010


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Men and MasculinitiesHome page
N. VITELLONE
Condoms and the Making of "Testosterone Man": A Cultural Analysis of the Male Sex Drive in AIDS Research on Safer Heterosex
Men and Masculinities, October 1, 2000; 3(2): 152 - 167.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SexualitiesHome page
H. Frith
Focusing on Sex: Using Focus Groups in Sex Research
Sexualities, August 1, 2000; 3(3): 275 - 297.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
E. W. Plumridge, S. J. Chetwynd, A. Reed, and S. J. Gifford
Discourses of Emotionality in Commercial Sex: The Missing Client Voice
Feminism Psychology, May 1, 1997; 7(2): 165 - 181.
[Abstract]