Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Feminism & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McIntyre, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lykes, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Who's the Boss? Confronting Whiteness and Power Differences within a Feminist Mentoring Relationship in Participatory Action Research

Alice McIntyre

Graduate School of Education and Allied Professions at Fairfield University, amcintyre{at}fairl.fairfield.edu

M. Brinton Lykes

School of Education at Boston College, lykes{at}bc.edu

In this article, we discuss the sometimes problematic and always challenging nature of feminist mentoring, particularly in a participatory action research project aimed at interrogating whiteness. We analyze our relationship by examining the multiple contexts in which it was embedded-power relations within the institution in which the research was conducted, our expectations of one another both during and after the research experience, our complementary and conflicting agendas, whiteness, social class and gender. We illuminate the nuanced complexities of our relationship providing feminist researchers and scholars with a lens that elucidates the kaleidoscope that is woman-to-woman academic relationships. Our experiences suggest possible strategies for white educators and researchers who seek to both rethink the meaning of whiteness and reimagine feminist mentoring relationships through creating liberatory research methodologies. In addition, we suggest that as feminist researchers we need to continually demonstrate our reflexivity through (re)articulating how we problematize power, privilege and the multiple unequal hierarchies that exist in feminist research.

Feminism & Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 4, 427-444 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0959353598084003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qualitative InquiryHome page
M. Evans, R. Hole, L. D. Berg, P. Hutchinson, and D. Sookraj
Common Insights, Differing Methodologies: Toward a Fusion of Indigenous Methodologies, Participatory Action Research, and White Studies in an Urban Aboriginal Research Agenda
Qualitative Inquiry, May 1, 2009; 15(5): 893 - 910.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
West J Nurs ResHome page
C. Varcoe
Doing Participatory Action Research in a Racist World
West J Nurs Res, August 1, 2006; 28(5): 525 - 540.
[Abstract] [PDF]