Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Feminism & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Croghan, R.
Right arrow Articles by Miell, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Strategies of Resistance: `Bad' Mothers Dispute the Evidence

Rosaleen Croghan

Open University

Dorothy Miell

Open University

Previous research has focused on the ways in which women who are clients of welfare agencies are constructed by professional discourse. In contrast, the present study looks at the ways in which women who are designated as `problem mothers' take issue with these professional definitions. A discourse-analytic approach is adopted in the analysis of the strategies of accommodation and resistance employed by such women. Particular attention is paid to the ways in which women seen as `bad mothers' position themselves within existing frameworks of `good mothering' and professional practice in order to establish the right to be heard. The analysis highlights some of the strategies through which such women can attempt to construct a positive maternal identity whilst negotiating for effective help from welfare agencies. Some of the implications of the enmeshment of resistance in appeals to common values are discussed, together with implications for professional practice.

Feminism & Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 4, 445-465 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0959353598084004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
J. Scourfield and I. Welsh
Risk, Reflexivity and Social Control in Child Protection: New Times or same Old Story?
Critical Social Policy, August 1, 2003; 23(3): 398 - 420.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
A. Woollett and M. Boyle
Reproduction, Women's Lives and Subjectivities
Feminism Psychology, August 1, 2000; 10(3): 307 - 311.
[PDF]